By: Christopher Tigno
In
a senate hearing last September 5, Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile argued with
Senator Pia Cayetano after the latter criticizied Senate Majority Floor Leader
Vicente Sotto III concerning the Reproductive Health Bill.
Enrile
insisted that the analysis of the controversial Senate Bill No. 2865 is
imperative as the law, if passed, will be abided by the country for the
succeeding years.
“It
is our duty as responsible people to dissect this bill, no matter how unpopular
our position is, to determine whether the policy is embedded in it is a right
policy or a destructive policy for this nation. And no one can lecture me about
these things. I know my history. I’ve learned it by rote, its hard labor. And I
resent being questioned about [and being asked to] state my purpose. Who are
you to challenge my purpose? I tell you, I’m going to dissect it,” Enrile told
The CBCP Monitor.
Though
Sotto, an anti-RH Bill advocate, was given the floor during Enrile’s inquiry,
Cayetano intercepted the Senate President in an attempt to halt and redirect to
the questions her way.
Enrile
said that lawmakers should take into consideration the national interests as
laws should involve citizens’ rationale.
“With
due respect to the lady senator, I know that she is eager to pass this law. But
I have my own notion of what the national interest is,” Enrile said. “Nobody
has a monopoly of wisdom about the national interest. I do not claim that I am
the only one who considers this country his country. And I have an interest to
protect my notion of what the future of this country will be.”
He
added: “I hope that I will not be shackled. And I resent any implication that I
am here to derail or obstruct the passage of any measure here. Nobody can
dictate to me, whoever you are.”
Sotto
has revealed foreign RH supporters who were connected to pro-abortion groups,
claiming that passing the law legitimizes abortion. RH programs are already
under 23 laws and government regulations, with funds reaching almost P8 billion
this year, which Sotto claims nulls the purpose of the bill.
No comments:
Post a Comment